Pages

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

The Bulwark: Tim Miller & Adam Kinzinger: 'LITERAL BRAIN WORMS! RFK Jr. is a Weird, Weird Man'

Source:The Bulwark with Tim Miller & Adam Kinzinger talking about RFK JR's brain damage.

"The ex-POTUS who claims he was taken down by the deep state is looking even smaller in court, getting scolded by the judge and sitting through testimony about how he and Melania don't sleep in the same bed. Plus, RFK Jr.'s brain worm, winning over the still-going Haley voters, and the plan to ban porn. Adam Kinzinger joins Tim Miller." 


As Fred Schneider wrote about Robert F. Kennedy JR back in March: 

"As an at best Independent Democrat at this point, whose not in love with the Democratic Party politically, or really anything else, for that matter, I would love to see Robert F. Kennedy JR. run for President as a Libertarian. Why? Because it would just confirm what I, what this blog, and what a lot of other Democrats believe about RFK JR. that he's simply a MAGA man, who at the very least doesn't want Joe Biden to be reelected and perhaps even wants Donald Trump back in The White House, where all their MAGA conspiracy theories and avenues to financially profit for them, would open up." 


As Fred Schneider wrote about Robert F. Kennedy JR. in April: 

"As far as RFK JR. telling CNN anchor Erin Burnett, who I'm a fan of and think she does a great job and is an excellent interviewer and really doesn't take any junk (to put it mildly) from her guests, once again Bob JR. is just trying to blame President Biden for something that he can't even try to defend." 


There are 3 things that I want to get into here. 

About, damn, time, The White House led by President Joe Biden, just took straight on antisemitism in America. They didn't blame it on the far-right or the far-left. But they also didn't have to. They also didn't play what about: 

"Oh, yeah, what about the discrimination against Arabs and Muslims?" Which is what you generally get from White Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. But she used to work for the left-wing political action group MoveOn. So what do you expect?

As far as the Stephanie Clifford's (also known as Stormy Daniels) testimony yesterday as far as how it effects the presidential election: 

I think most Americans think at least when they're being honest, (even if it's just with themselves) who are pretty familiar with Donald J. Trump, think the man is a slime-ball. But MAGA doesn't care, because maybe they're slime-balls as well and maybe he's just a slime-ball with people they don't like. (According to them) 

But, you still have maybe 1-5 Republicans who don't want to vote for Donald Trump again. And who don't want to vote Joe Biden either. We're seeing that again with the Indiana primary last night where 1-5 Republicans voted for Nikki Haley, whose not even running for President anymore. But maybe they're thinking now, Donald Trump is simply too bad of a man, who doesn't care about anyone other than himself, and they simply don't want him back in The White House again.

As far as Robert F. Kennedy JR: The New Democrat has been pretty clear about him from the beginning. He's a better looking, more intelligent, perhaps healthier, younger (even though he's 70 years old)  Donald Trump. But now we know he also has brain damage, which explains his braindead presidential campaign. (Pun intended) And maybe he's looking for a way to get out of this election, because he's now seeing polling that his campaign is hurting Donald Trump. Which he doesn't want and is looking for a way to get out of this, before he hurts Trump even more. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Michael Smerconish Takes On The Stormy Testimony

Source:Michael Smerconish talking about Defendant Don't Stormy day. If you are going to cheat on your wife, while she's pregnant with your son, why not with a porn chick?You can see why he never wanted this story to ever go out, especially during his political career.

"Devil in the Details" 


"Adult film star Stormy Daniels dished out salacious details of her alleged sexual encounter with former President Donald Trump in 2006 from the witness stand on Tuesday, describing how they met at a celebrity golf tournament and what she says happened when she went to Trump’s Lake Tahoe hotel room.

In a mostly casual and conversational tone, Daniels recounted details from the floors and furniture in Trump’s hotel room to the contents of his toiletry kit in the bathroom. At one point in court, Daniels threw back her arm and lifted her leg in the witness box to re-create the moment she says Trump posed on his hotel bed for her, stripped down to his undergarments.

Former President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference held at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida on February 08, 2024... 

From CNN

From what I wrote about this yesterday: 

"Now that the Manhattan District Attorney is at let's say the 5 yard line (to use a football reference) as far as establishing that Donald Trump not only knew about the payments to Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but why they were made, the prosecution now wants to establish the affairs actually happened as well. So the defense can't argue that their client was being extorted. ..


As my colleague Kire Schneider wrote about this yesterday: 

"If you are familiar with the phrase details matter: well, you should be because they do. You don't just have Stephanie Clifford on the witness stand that she had an affair with Mr. Trump, or that she banged him (to be frank) but you have her up there talking about exactly how they met and what they did that night according to her. 

Stephanie Clifford gave the jury deep details about how Mr. Trump and one of his assistants got her up to his suite and that he wanted (my words) like  the 16 year old guy whose never got any before, trying to impress the hot girl in school, by trying to look like Hugh Hefner with his white robe. With her basically telling him that he looked ridiculous and asking him to put a shirt on. As well as her asking him... 


I just wanted to talk about the CNN commentary from last night first and then I'll get into Michael Smerconish's take on this, which isn't mush different from what they were saying. 

If you include the anchor Anderson Cooper, they had 8 people on his main panel: 

Laura Coates, Kaitlan Collins, Ellie Honig, John Berman, Abbie Phillip, Jeffrey Toobin, and Arthur Aidala. Coates, Honig, Toobin, and Aidala, are all lawyers. 

Of the eight panelists and the 3 lawyers on the panel, only Arthur Aidala was arguing that the prosecution should even bring Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) to the witness stand. 

Laura Coates was saying: "I don't know if you either bring her up at all. Maybe in the beginning of the case. And go to the documents and the document witnesses after." Right, start this case off with the porn chick and leave the jury with her as their first impression of this case. 

Arthur Aidala whose a defense attorney from Brooklyn, whose been arguing for three weeks now, that there's no crime here, was the only lawyer arguing that Manhattan had to call Stephanie Clifford  up, because without her, you have no motive. And the defense could just argue that Donald Trump was being extorted by Stephanie Clifford and company. 

Again, details matter. Maybe they could've brought her up after Michael Cohen, but hopefully not closed with her. But without a real reason for the hush money, as well as proving that Donald Trump knew about these payments and signed off on then and they were about protecting his 2016 presidential campaign, the Manhattan District Attorney has no case. 

This jury now knows that Donald Trump had an affair with Stephanie Clifford exactly when she said they did. And their damn close to knowing and probably are already assuming, that he paid her off in 2016, to protect his presidential campaign. Which would make him guilty of 2 campaign finance felonies in New York: An illegal campaign contribution to his own campaign and failure to disclose that campaign contribution. 

And to what Michael Smerconish was saying here: ( Mr. Independent, straight down the middle commentator) He was basically just backing up what CNN was saying last night. With his sidekick CC there saying: "Don't details matter? Doesn't the jury need to know about the affair and why the payments were made?" Basically contradicting her boss on his radio show. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Meidas Touch: Stormy Day For Donald J. Trump

Source:Meidas Touch looking at the Stormy day (pun intended) for Donald J. Trump.

"MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the first part of the testimony at Donald Trump’s criminal trial by the witness he feared the most." 

From the Meidas Touch

"The prosecutors are taking special delight in using TRUMP’S own quotes from his books about KNOWING EVERY DETAIL ABOUT HIS COMPANY down to his penny-pinching, & paper clip counting, to prove that Michael Cohen got fraudulently repaid for paying Stormy Daniels WITH TRUMP’s KNOWLEGE and CONSENT. Michael Popok breaks down the testimony to the jury of Random House executive managing editor Sally Franklin in front of an increasingly frustrated Trump." 

Source:Meidas Touch looking at the Stormy day (pun intended) for Donald J. Trump.

From the Meidas Touch

As my colleague Fred Schneider wrote yesterday: 

"And then again as a non-lawyer, I would like the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal actually get established in court, so the defense can't argue that these women with their lawyer Keith Davidson, we're extorting Donald Trump." 


As I wrote yesterday: 

"I'm with Fred, I want these affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal to be factually established. But maybe in this "perfect omelette" you want both bacon and perhaps chili as well. And if I'm the Manhattan District Attorney, I want both the bacon and chili, not to make my omelette perfect. (One or the other would be fine though) But to make the criminal case against Donald J. Trump perfect." 


As my colleague Fred Schneider wrote earlier today: 

"Now that the Manhattan District Attorney is at let's say the 5 yard line (to use a football reference) as far as establishing that Donald Trump not only knew about the payments to Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but why they were made, the prosecution now wants to establish the affairs actually happened as well. So the defense can't argue that their client was being extorted. ..


I don't want to sound like CNN legal analyst Ellie Honig here, (and I promise this will be last the time I paraphrase him on this post) but when you are looking at cases like this, it helps to look at it from the perspective of a juror on the case. Whether you think Donald J. Trump is greater than Jesus Christ, or worst than Satan, (and you know where The New Democrat is on that question) if you are going to vote to convict or acquit, you want to make sure you have enough evidence to do either first. And you are not there simply to trash Donald Trump and ruin his life, or to save him. 

I only mention that, to try to knock you out into a coma. I'm trying to see how many insomniacs I can put to asleep. Even just for a day. Actually, I have a legitimate reason for that as well. We're now starting to see the heart of the Manhattan District Attorney's case: 

Manhattan has established that Donald Trump not only knew about Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) not only knew her not just in 2016 (that Trump Tower meeting a good clue there) but they now established that he met her back in 2006 at the Lake Tahoe golf show that she was talking about. 

Manhattan has established that the Trump Campaign was freaking out about the public, perhaps especially Republican suburban and urban women and Independents, about these affairs coming out before the 2016 presidential election. Not what Mr. Trump's wife and son Barron would think about these stories. 

Manhattan has established that Karen McDougal and Stephanie Clifford were paid off to keep silent about these stories, at least until after the 2016 election. And they're damn close to proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that he knew not only that these payments were made, but why they were made. 

If you are familiar with the phrase details matter: well, you should be because they do. You don't just have Stephanie Clifford on the witness stand that she had an affair with Mr. Trump, or that she banged him (to be frank) but you have her up there talking about exactly how they met and what they did that night according to her. 

Stephanie Clifford gave the jury deep details about how Mr. Trump and one of his assistants got her up to his suite and that he wanted (my words) like  the 16 year old guy whose never got any before, trying to impress the hot girl in school, by trying to look like Hugh Hefner with his white robe. With her basically telling him that he looked ridiculous and asking him to put a shirt on. As well as her asking him: 

"Aren't you worried about your wife finding out about us having sex?"And according to Clifford, Trump saying that they sleep in separate bedrooms". I guess suggesting that Melania wouldn't care.

Again, we're not lawyers here. But if the Manhattan District Attorney not only prove that Donald Trump not only knew about the payments, knew why they were being made, and signed off on them, (and hopefully they can do that before Michael Cohen takes the stand) and that he wasn't being extorted by Karen McDougal and Stephanie Clifford, they're going to get their felony convictions. And they're having an excellent week so far in achieving all of that. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Don Lemon: 'LIVE: STORMY WITH A CHANCE OF JAIL! Diane Kiesel & Paul Callan'

Source:Don Lemon talking to two New York City lawyers about Stephanie Clifford's (also known as Stormy Daniels) testimony against Defendant Don.

"Don Lemon sits down with NY Law School Adjunct Professor and Retired NY Supreme Court Justice Diane Kiesel and Former New York City Prosecutor & Criminal Defense Attorney Paul Callan to discuss the latest in Trump's criminal trial." 

From the Don Lemon Show

As I said about this yesterday: 

"And then again as a non-lawyer, I would like the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal actually get established in court, so the defense can't argue that these women with their lawyer Keith Davidson, we're extorting Donald Trump." 


As my colleague Kire Schneider said yesterday: 

"I'm with Fred, I want these affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal to be factually established. But maybe in this "perfect omelette" you want both bacon and perhaps chili as well. And if I'm the Manhattan District Attorney, I want both the bacon and chili, not to make my omelette perfect. (One or the other would be fine though) But to make the criminal case against Donald J. Trump perfect." 


Now that the Manhattan District Attorney is at let's say the 5 yard line (to use a football reference) as far as establishing that Donald Trump not only knew about the payments to Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but why they were made, the prosecution now wants to establish the affairs actually happened as well. So the defense can't argue that their client was being extorted. 

The fact that Stephanie Clifford not only said that she had an affair in 2006 with Donald J. Trump, but laid out details that only the two people involved in the alleged affair could possibly know about, helps her. 

One could could say (especially a MAGA member or good defense lawyer) that this is just the word of a porn chick and reality TV star. (To put it bluntly and if they were completely honest) Who are you going to believe? A tie would go to the defendant in this case. But the fact that Donald Trump's lawyers are already calling for a mistrial because of the Stormy details, (pun intended) tells me they believe her testimony is not helpful to them and even damaging. But again, I'm not a lawyer. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Monday, May 6, 2024

Michael Popok: 'Prosecutors MAKE GOOD ON PROMISE At Donald Trump Trial'

Source:Meidas Touch- left to right: Manhattan Criminal Judge Juan Merchan & Defendant Don.

"At the criminal trial of Trump, the prosecutors are following the “statement of facts” script they publicly disclosed last year, to a T. Michael Popok explains the purpose of the “statement of facts”, what the prosecutors have proved already through the first 5 witnesses, and what and in what order is left to come over the next 2-3 weeks including —wait for it—Trump’s disgraced Controller and Accounts Payable Supervisor!" 

From the Meidas Touch

"Susanne Craig, New York Times Investigative Reporter, Melissa Murray, NYU Law University Professor and Vaughn Hillyard, NBC News Correspondent, joins Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with reaction to Day 12 of the Trump Hush Money trial which included the prosecution calling two Trump Organization employees laying the groundwork for the prosecution's argument that Donald Trump was a micromanager who would know about every payment being made on his behalf." 

Source:MSNBC with a shot at Defendant Don.

From MSNBC

As my colleague Fred Schneider talked about earlier today: 

"But, as a non-lawyer, I would like to see another credible witness, pre-Michael Cohen, who was close to DJT, or who still is close to DJT, take the stand and back up what David Pecker has exposed (pun intended) and what Hope Hicks said on Friday about DJT's knowledge about what was going on here and what he intended to do about it. Which was to burry the story, at least before the 2016 presidential election, by paying these women off with his money. Which was the money he paid back to his then lawyer Michael Cohen, for paying off Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, back in late 2016 before the election." 


I'm not much of a baker, or even cook, for that matter, but if I was trying to put together the perfect omelette (let's say) and I already had the eggs, (well, hopefully) and I have the cheese, I have the tomatoes, the onions, etc. But there's that one thing left that make this omelette perfect, that I don't have yet, I think we now have one of the two final ingredients in this case. 

Think about it, Donald Trump's New York hush money case is like that perfect omelette in waiting: 

Manhattan has the man who worked with the catch and kill scheme, David Pecker. 

They have the bank records that prove that these payments were made. 

They have the lawyer for Stephanie Clifford, (also known as Stormy Daniels) Keith Davidson, who negotiated these hush money payments for his clients. 

They now know thanks to Hope Hicks that it was the 2016 presidential election that the Trump Campaign was focused on when they learned that the two affairs with these women were about to get out. Not what Donald Trump's wife Melania or his Barron thought about it. 

Now they have the records and the testimony from the Trump Organization's comptroller, Jeffrey McConney, that these payments were not just made, but that Donald Trump knew about them. 

I'm with Fred, I want these affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal to be factually established. But maybe in this "perfect omelette" you want both bacon and perhaps chili as well. And if I'm the Manhattan District Attorney, I want both the bacon and chili, not to make my omelette perfect. (One or the other would be fine though) But to make the criminal case against Donald J. Trump perfect.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

The Bulwark: 'George Conway Explains: Why Donald Trump WILL Be CONVICTED In The NY Case!'

Source:The Bulwark with Sarah Conwell & George Conway on Donald Trump's Manhattan trial.

"Sarah Longwell and George Conway take on Trump's New York criminal trial: Hope Hicks' testimony and a story about Trump glaring at George across the courtroom. Don't worry -- George explains it all." 


Just to talk about Donald Trump's latest gag order violations and what could happen in the future: George Conway gets to that in this video around the 15 minute mark (give or take) in this video. He was talking about there''s essentially a bridge that Judge Juan Merchan could take before he throws Defendant Don (as The New Democrat as politely as we can call Donald J. Trump) in Rikers. And just doesn't settle for $1,000 fine after $1,000 fine. 

If this courthouse has a holding tank (for lack of a better name) where the Judge can send unruly defendants, who are like 12 year old boys who are being told that they can't go to the ballgame or their friend's party, because they're failing English or got caught shoplifting, or something. 

I sort of got into this 2 weeks ago:

"But I'm wondering if Defendant Don keeps violating the gag order, could the Judge take that out on his lawyer and do that first, before he holds the defendant in contempt and throws him in a holding tank." 


As far as this case, I don't know if Donald Trump is "screwed" yet, as George Conway seems to be implying. But you can see him being screwed (by someone he doesn't want to get screwed by) from where he's right now. 

The jurors have Donald Trump's bank records. Thanks to Hope Hicks and David Pecker, they know that Donald Trump not only knew about the payments, knew why they were made, and Donald Trump was concern about the Stormy affairs (pun intended) coming out before the 2016 presidential election, instead of being concern about how these stories would affect his wife Melania and son Barron. 

But, as a non-lawyer, I would like to see another credible witness, pre-Michael Cohen, who was close to DJT, or who still is close to DJT, take the stand and back up what David Pecker has exposed (pun intended) and what Hope Hicks said on Friday about DJT's knowledge about what was going on here and what he intended to do about it. Which was to burry the story, at least before the 2016 presidential election, by paying these women off with his money. Which was the money he paid back to his then lawyer Michael Cohen, for paying off Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, back in late 2016 before the election. 

And then again as a non-lawyer, I would like the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal actually get established in court, so the defense can't argue that these women with their lawyer Keith Davidson, we're extorting Donald Trump. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Friday, May 3, 2024

Ben Meiselas: 'Donald Trump Top Aide STICKS THE DAGGER in Him At Trial'

Source:Meidas Touch left to right: Donald Trump's longtime communications assistant Hope Hicks & Defendant Don himself.

"MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the devastating trial testimony by Donald Trump’s former top aide Hope Hicks." 

From the Meidas Touch

"Taking the stand in Trump's criminal trial, the ex-White House aide was reunited with her former boss, whom she said she hadn't seen in almost two years.

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks took the stand Friday in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial, a tense reunion for the former president and a woman who was once one of his closest aides.

"I'm really nervous," Hicks said as she took the stand as the ninth witness to be called in the case, and led the jury through a dramatic inside account of Trump's reaction to the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape that nearly derailed his first presidential bid.

She later broke down in tears at the start of her cross-examination by Trump attorney Emil Bove, when he asked about the Trump family having given her an opportunity to work at their company, leading to a short recess while she composed herself.

Hicks started work at the Trump Organization in 2014 before going to work on Trump's 2016 campaign and then his administration. Another witness, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, said she was in and out of a key meeting he had with Trump and his then-lawyer Michael Cohen in 2015, where Pecker agreed to help them suppress stories that could hurt Trump's campaign.

Cohen and Pecker are key figures in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against Trump. Prosecutors say the three men organized a scheme that resulted in Cohen’s paying adult film star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about a sexual encounter she said she had with Trump in 2006. Trump later repaid Cohen in payments the DA says he falsely classified as legal expenses.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 counts of falsifying business records. He has also denied having an affair with Daniels or another woman at the center of the case, former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Hicks said Friday she has not spoken to Trump in almost two years.

She told the jury when she worked on Trump's campaign as his press secretary beginning in 2015, they would speak multiple times a day. Asked how large their press team was, Hicks said, "It was just me and Mr. Trump" until the later stages of his successful run, and she lauded his communications and branding skills.

"We were all just following his lead," she said.

Asked if she was in and out of a meeting with Pecker, she said she didn't remember but that it was "possible." She said she remembered Trump praising articles the Enquirer had done slamming his then-Republican rivals Ben Carson and Sen. Ted Cruz. She recalled that Trump called an article that tried to link Cruz's father to the Kennedy assassination "great reporting." Pecker testified that the piece was a concoction.

She said the size of the staff had grown by Oct. 2016, which is when she got an email from a Washington Post reporter with an "extremely urgent request" for comment on what subsequently became known as the "Access Hollywood" tape. The 2005 hot mic recording includes audio of Trump making lewd comments about women and saying he can grope them without their consent.

Hicks said she was "very concerned" by the email — both about the contents "and the lack of time to respond." She said she forwarded the request on to campaign leadership, including Kellyanne Conway, Steve Bannon and Jason Miller. She eventually found them altogether preparing for Trump's debate with Hillary Clinton.

She said Trump asked her what was going on, and she read the email aloud to him. She said she had a vague recollection of starting to read the transcript of his remarks that the Post reporter had sent, and that Trump then he read the rest of it to himself. “That doesn’t sound like something I would say,” she recalled him saying.

When they began talking about how to respond, Trump suggested the tape was not a big deal and “not anything to get so upset over,” Hicks said, and he called it “pretty standard stuff for two guys” talking.

Hicks said she was "stunned" when she eventually heard the tape and had a sense it would be a "massive story" and a "crisis."

The campaign put out a short statement from Trump calling the remarks "locker room banter." He later tweeted a video statement, where he said “I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize,” before going on to attack Clinton." 

From NBC News

As I wrote about this last week: 

"They show that he had an affair with Stormy Daniels and perhaps Karen McDougal as well, but that he not just tried to cover up those affairs with hush money. 

And not just try to prevent his wife Melania and his son Barron from finding out about these affairs, but to prevent the voters, especially Independents, as well as Republican college educated, urban and suburban women from finding out about these affairs, before they voted in 2016

As well as covered up these affairs and did that with illegal political contributions to his his own 2016 presidential campaign, that he didn't even report, which is another crime in New York 

They can convict Defendant Don of election interference as well, which is a felony in New York. 

And this David Pecker-Michael Cohen link with the hush money payments is a direct way to move the ball down that road."


As I wrote about this on Tuesday:  

"So according to the Meidas Touch, (at least) Hope Hicks not only knew about the adulterous affairs that Donald Trump had with both Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal. And perhaps was in on setting up the payoffs to both women to keep them both quiet before the 2016 presidential election. 

If that's true, they now have two credible witnesses before they get to McDougal and Clifford, that these affairs not just happened, the women were not just paid off, but paid off to keep them quiet before the 2016 presidential election. And if that's the case, they now have him on two felonies. And you just need the paperwork, the bank records, the phone calls, texts, emails, etc, to prove this story." 


As I wrote about this yesterday: 

"We already now know that the payoffs not just happened from Donald J. Trump to Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but that Donald Trump knew about them, and they were done to prevent the women from coming out with their stories right before the 2016 elections. And it's not just David Pecker who exposed that evidence, (pun intended) but Keith Davidson this week, as well as Hope Hicks being a key witness to this illegal scheme. Now it's just a matter of proving that DJT had these affairs in the 1st place with Clifford and McDougal."  


As my colleague Fred Schneider wrote earlier today: 

"As Kire believe already talked about and even mentioned this, Hope Hicks establishes that the Trump Campaign in 2016, including herself, were focused on not just how the Access Hollywood tape would affect their campaign, perhaps especially with Independents and Republican women. But also how the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal would affect their campaign as well. Not how this affect Donald Trump's wife and son. Which really is the only reason why these payoffs were made. And I'm sure Donald didn't want Melania leaving him before the election that year. But that just might be a guess on my part. 

I was watching CNN's late coverage of this trial last night. And at least one of their lawyers, I think including Ellie Honig was arguing that the prosecution doesn't need to establish that the affairs even happened. Just the payoffs and coverups. But as New York defense attorney Arthur Aidala (whose no fan of this case) argued the defense can argue that Donald Trump was being extorted by Keith Davidson and his two female clients. If they establish that the affairs actually happened and can prove that, there goes the defense's only good argument, that their client was being extorted by Davidson, Clifford, and McDougal." 


Again we're not lawyers here and I don't want to call this: "Game, set, match" (or whatever the legal term is for game over) but the Manhattan prosecutors have already established that the payments to Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal not only happened, by why they happened, that Donald Trump paid them and why he paid them. 

DJT didn't want these stories breaking that he had adulterous affairs while his wife Melania was pregnant with his son Barron back in 2006, coming out right before the 2016 presidential election. And Hope Hicks testified today that Michael Cohen not only gave the the women the money but Donald Trump knew about the payments and he did that for him. And we also know that Donald Trump paid Cohen back for those payments.

Now I think the prosecution has to also establish the affairs, so the defense can't argue that Defendant Don (as The New Democrat as politely as we can all Donald Trump) that he was being extorted by these two women and their lawyer Keith Davidson. And I don't see how you do that with out Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal, since these affairs happened, (and I believe they did) they were obviously there and you would think they would be able to corroborate them. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat
Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy in 1960